Italian Version

The People vs. Carlo Parlanti

 
 

Trial files repository

800 South Victoria Avenue, Stanza 313, Ventura, California 39009
For ufficial trascription, for more information clik to download

Carlo Parlanti has been convicted on a basis of events completely illogical and impossible under the aw of physics and biology.

J

Second Day Rebecca White examination: A. It is my last e-mail to Katia.Q In that e-mail, do you make any reference to your affection for Mr. Parlanti? A. Yes. Q Do you make any reference to Mr. Parlanti's penis? A. Yes. Q As a source of pleasure for you? A. Is this a "yes" or "no" question? Q Yes. A. Yes.

 

-----Original Message-----
From: DA Criminal [mailto:DA.Criminal@ventura.org]
Sent: giovedì 16 luglio 2009 19.53
To: katia@carloparlanti.it
Subject: Investigation Determination

 

Dear Ms. Anedda:

 

In general, the District Attorney’s Office does not investigate

allegations of criminal conduct.  Instead, our office relies upon local

law enforcement agencies to complete an investigation and then refer the

investigative reports to our office for a decision as to whether or not

the evidence is sufficient to prove a crime beyond a reasonable doubt.

Then, a deputy district attorney will review the facts in the reports

and apply the law to those facts to make a filing decision.  The

specific factual circumstances and the specific statutory definition of

the crime as well as the applicable statute of limitations and

jurisdiction requirements are necessary to make a decision as to whether

or not a criminal prosecution by our office is appropriate.  In

addition, we adhere to our ethical obligations, which include not filing

a criminal charge unless there is a reasonable probability of being able

to prove the charged offense in court to a jury of twelve persons.

 

You contend that the District Attorney’s Office must prove a negative

as to a number of specific factual claims that you have set forth.  That

is not the law and the District Attorney’s Office declines to engage

in the debate or the process that you appear to seek.

 

In California, the district attorney of each county is the public

prosecutor and is vested with the power to charge persons within that

jurisdiction with criminal offenses.  The District Attorney is not

required to file all possible criminal cases, but is vested with

substantial discretion in selecting which cases to charge and at what

level.

 

With respect to your allegations of criminal conduct by Rebecca White

(the victim in the Carlo Parlanti prosecution), the District

Attorney’s Office agreed to review the information provided,

because of its direct relationship to the criminal prosecution of Carlo

Parlanti.  That review has been completed and you have been advised that

there is insufficient evidence to support a criminal prosecution based

upon a claim that Rebecca White or anybody else committed any crimes

relating to the Carlo Parlanti prosecution.

 

As noted in the prior message sent to you, you are free to pursue your

claims further by contacting the State of California Office of the

Attorney General.  This office will not be responsive to repeated

requests to take action that we have determined should not be taken.

 

Very truly yours,

 

Gregory W. Brose

Chief Deputy District Attorney

Special Prosecutions Division

Ventura County District Attorney’s Office

 

 

 

 


 
 
Wasn't until redirect that she said wrote them at different times. And then the sheets get her again on this. Once again, if there's pools of blood on those sheets and somebody changes the sheets, how does Mr. Parlanti not find that diary? Willfully false. Cannot leave bed for two days. Could not leave bed for two days; yet, making all her diary entries for Mr. Parlanti, making them. Her explanation, which I really didn't get on this, there it is, is that if you look at them, you can tell she was writing them at the same angle at the same time. I have no understanding of what that means
webmaster